DEMO ยท SAMPLE DATA Fictional partners. No live orders, credit redemption or connected systems.

A suspension spans the month end a referral qualifies in

Partner A is suspended on 5 March and reinstated on 10 April. A referral's qualification period ends on 11 March, inside the suspension, and the April launch month falls due on 1 April while it is open, so it is withheld and then closes unissued (OQ-08 / OQ-31, held under every reading here). The agreement says a suspension can happen but not what it costs.

affiliate_suspended_over_month_end scenarioOQ-23 question31 May 2026 as of

Look at: Credits proposed by the May review, after reinstatement, and credits held. The published rule set holds them: not issued, not lost. The two candidate policies are simulation assumptions -- deferred means the partner eventually receives them; forfeited means the suspension permanently cost them.

The readings

Published agreement reading

Published: held pending a written answer

Section 9.3 permits withholding while the Company investigates, but says nothing about what happens after reinstatement. Credits earned inside the suspension window are held and reported.

Pending Credits
0 credits
Held Credits (policy unresolved)
160 credits
Credits the current-month review would propose (provisional)
0 credits

Simulated as fitgrill.fuel_partner/3.1+sim(unresolved)

Alternative interpretation

Simulation assumption: deferred until reinstatement

Suspension pauses payment rather than cancelling what was earned.

Pending Credits
10 credits
Held Credits (policy unresolved)
150 credits
Credits the current-month review would propose (provisional)
10 credits

Difference from the published reading: +10 credits in the provisional current-month review; -10 credits held

Simulated as fitgrill.fuel_partner/3.1+sim(deferred)

Alternative interpretation

Simulation assumption: forfeited

Suspension is a consequence, and credits earned during it are lost even if the review later finds no fault.

Pending Credits
0 credits
Held Credits (policy unresolved)
150 credits
Credits the current-month review would propose (provisional)
0 credits

Difference from the published reading: -10 credits held

Simulated as fitgrill.fuel_partner/3.1+sim(forfeited)

What differs

Only the fields the readings disagree about.

Scroll the table sideways to see every column.

FieldPublished: held pending a written answerSimulation assumption: deferred until reinstatementSimulation assumption: forfeited
Pending Credits0 credits10 credits0 credits
Held Credits (policy unresolved)160 credits150 credits150 credits
Credits the current-month review would propose (provisional)0 credits10 credits0 credits

Qualifying dollars per customer

The same customers, the same orders, read two ways.

Scroll the table sideways to see every column.

CustomerPublished: held pending a written answerSimulation assumption: deferred until reinstatementSimulation assumption: forfeited
cus_susp$60.00$60.00$60.00

Also affects: launch grant, referral credits, Subsequent Purchase Bonuses, retention credits

Nothing on this page is a decision. Every column is what the agreement could mean, and the simulation cannot change the published terms. All scenarios โ†’